Eye of the Needle: The Heart-Racing Thriller from the Multi-million Copy International Bestseller of The Kingsbridge Series

I was shaking when the finished the last chapter. What a book! What a thriller!.This was the best thriller I have read till date. The ending really gave me goosebumps. The characters are so well connected. I was scared at a moment for a precious character and simultaneously felt bad for the other one. When war strikes, killers are patriots and patriots are killers ,whether killing makes one a hero or a murderer becomes a game of perspective. While in one moment I rooted for Faber, in the second I felt sorry for his unintended preys. The book was gripping till the end. The epilogue gave it an amazing conclusion. I highly recommend it.

It is a good spy thriller based on World War 2. It has all the ingredients for a mass entertainer: Thrill, Romance, Violence, Patriotism. You will not surely get bang for your buck.

Well I loved it! I may be biased about this book, because I had been waiting for 12 years due to personal reasons, before I actually got a copy of this book to read. So, yeah!

The story is absorbing

This was the first book where I found the central character is an antagonist - a Nazi spy. It is so masterfully written that its pace never slackens. The ingenuity of 'The Needle' made me root for him! The tense atmosphere of WWII days is palpable with the British and German generals discussing their strategies and Churchill & Hitler making a few page appearances. And his mission has such high stakes that this book really is unputdownable!

The book follows the stories of a German spy, two MI5 operatives trying to catch him and a newly-wed RAF pilot's family. The story is superbly paced and I was rooting for every single character when I was reading their parts. Simply amazing! If you like fast paced, well researched spy thrillers, get the book already!

Racy read indeed.. But the plot is very much predictable. I started reading this after finishing Ken Follett's Century Trilogy and unfortunately couldn't adjust myself to reading one in a much smaller canvas. Considering that this is Ken's first one (or among the very early ones), the book is fine in terms of the plot and the narrative. But, as mentioned previously, it was very very predictable.

Keeps you on the edge, true Follet style. The best description of an Island, master writer and a great plot.

Follett is a master of the historical narrative. The characters are living, breathing beings without much clichés and he describes the events in front of the well known historic background of the imminent D-Day in 1944 with such mastery, that I could not put the novel aside. Tipp: read Eye of the Needle first and then Jackdaws ... thrilling.

Very well thought out plot and authentic WW2 story Recommend to all who enjoy the writer who always delivers well.

Un livre déjà ancien de Ken Follett mais sans aucun doute il maîtrisait déjà bien l'écriture :-)) L'histoire est passionnante et les personnages très bien étudiés. Beaucoup aimé ce livre.

From the start the story is interesting and fast. It reads quickly and not to hard for non native. Although I learned some new words as well. Recommended if you like spy novels.

Eye of the Needle is clearly one of the best suspense novels ever written. I recently re-read it, and enjoyed it even more the second time. I read it again as part of a self-education project (which you can find by searching the web for "lew weinstein's novel writing blog"), so my comments are organized around various "writing topics" which are important to me. In a technique that I used in my new legal thriller A Good Conviction , (although I don't presume to have done it as well as Follett did), Follett employs what he calls a "ping-pong" structure, alternating between the characters, switching focus abruptly at the end of scenes, and leaving the reader in suspense for many pages before resuming the thread. This structure was, according to an essay by Follett appended to the end of my copy, developed in the author's original story outline and then rigidly adhered to, and it worked splendidly, forcing him to consider the impact of each character's actions on the other, and offering ample latitude for enriched attention to character, landscape and emotion. Eye of the Needle is also a historical novel, and as a writer of historical fiction myself ( The Heretic (Library of American Fiction) , my first novel, is set in 15th century Spain), I am particularly impressed with Follett's ability to write a suspenseful story despite the fact that we know D-day succeeded, and thus that Faber failed. Follett draws the distinction between fact and fiction with a one page historical preface about the D-Day deception. He ends the preface ... "That much is history. What follows is fiction. Still and all, one suspects something like this must have happened." We're immediately intrigued. Follett brilliantly, and necessarily, transfers his fictional tension away from whether Faber will succeed ... to how he will be foiled. In the process, he creates a superb heroine who rises to larger-than-life status in the greatest two days of her life. In this regard, Eye of the Needle is much like Frederick Forsythe's The Day of the Jackal , where we know that De Gaulle was not murdered by a sniper but are carried into exquisite tension anyway, again over how the also enormously competent Jackal will be stopped. Follett's two main characters are complex and well developed. Faber of course is the villain. But he is also patriotic (to Germany), quite competent, and even capable of feelings, which he must repress in order to carry out his mission. He is a wonderful lover, which he could not be if he were truly devoid of feeling. This complex character must be admired even as we hate and fear him. A remarkable achievement. Lucy starts out as a dominated young woman, who chooses to escape to her father-in-law's island rather than live among people. But in her virtual solitude, she develops an unexpected resolve, and when faced with the ultimate challenge, she rises to it. Is what she does believable? Maybe not, although in wartime people do extraordinary things. In any case, it doesn't matter since Follett portrays this larger-than-life character in a way that fully engages the reader's emotions as we root for her to succeed against the far stronger and better trained Faber. The final scenes and epilogue drew tears from this romantic reader, but then I'm always a sucker for melodrama. Godliman (What a name! I'd love to know where Follett got it.) is the enabler of the story, providing the narrative links that show lead Faber to Lucy. But how much better to provide these through an interesting character than through narrative prose. Godliman's growth from passive professor to razor-sharp spycatcher is done a little quickly. We can believe it, but we would like to know more about him. Perhaps as the third character, he doesn't warrant more attention. Follett uses several writing techniques that I found quite instructive. At least once in the story, the omniscient narrator speaks in his own voice, providing a foreshadowing that sets the stage while piquing the reader's interest. The narrator interjects "Faber ... Godliman ... two-thirds of a triangle that one day would be crucially completed by ... David and Lucy." Follett has Faber ask himself questions about what he should do ... should he bury the five dead men? ...what should he do with the boat? ... should he jump on a passing train? This technique allows the exploration of options within the context of the story instead of more clumsily by the narrator. There is also a short flashback scene where Faber dreams about his first arrival in London. We first think it's a true dream, but soon learn it is not. This allows us to learn both how Faber actually arrived in London and also how terrified he is about being discovered. There' much more in this great suspense story, but I think this review has gone on long enough. If you want more, I invite you check my blog.